--- /dev/null
+git-rerere(1)
+=============
+
+NAME
+----
+git-rerere - Reuse recorded resolve
+
+SYNOPSIS
+--------
+'git-rerere'
+
+
+DESCRIPTION
+-----------
+
+In a workflow that employs relatively long lived topic branches,
+the developer sometimes needs to resolve the same conflict over
+and over again until the topic branches are done (either merged
+to the "release" branch, or sent out and accepted upstream).
+
+This command helps this process by recording conflicted
+automerge results and corresponding hand-resolve results on the
+initial manual merge, and later by noticing the same automerge
+results and applying the previously recorded hand resolution.
+
+[NOTE]
+You need to create `$GIT_DIR/rr-cache` directory to enable this
+command.
+
+DISCUSSION
+----------
+
+When your topic branch modifies overlapping area that your
+master branch (or upstream) touched since your topic branch
+forked from it, you may want to test it with the latest master,
+even before your topic branch is ready to be pushed upstream:
+
+------------
+ o---*---o topic
+ /
+ o---o---o---*---o---o master
+------------
+
+For such a test, you need to merge master and topic somehow.
+One way to do it is to pull master into the topic branch:
+
+------------
+ $ git checkout topic
+ $ git pull . master
+
+ o---*---o---+ topic
+ / /
+ o---o---o---*---o---o master
+------------
+
+The commits marked with `*` touch the same area in the same
+file; you need to resolve the conflicts when creating the commit
+marked with `+`. Then you can test the result to make sure your
+work-in-progress still works with what is in the latest master.
+
+After this test merge, there are two ways to continue your work
+on the topic. The easiest is to build on top of the test merge
+commit `+`, and when your work in the topic branch is finally
+ready, pull the topic branch into master, and/or ask the
+upstream to pull from you. By that time, however, the master or
+the upstream might have been advanced since the test merge `+`,
+in which case the final commit graph would look like this:
+
+------------
+ $ git checkout topic
+ $ git pull . master
+ $ ... work on both topic and master branches
+ $ git checkout master
+ $ git pull . topic
+
+ o---*---o---+---o---o topic
+ / / \
+ o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master
+------------
+
+When your topic branch is long-lived, however, your topic branch
+would end up having many such "Merge from master" commits on it,
+which would unnecessarily clutter the development history.
+Readers of the Linux kernel mailing list may remember that Linus
+complained about such too frequent test merges when a subsystem
+maintainer asked to pull from a branch full of "useless merges".
+
+As an alternative, to keep the topic branch clean of test
+merges, you could blow away the test merge, and keep building on
+top of the tip before the test merge:
+
+------------
+ $ git checkout topic
+ $ git pull . master
+ $ git reset --hard HEAD^ ;# rewind the test merge
+ $ ... work on both topic and master branches
+ $ git checkout master
+ $ git pull . topic
+
+ o---*---o-------o---o topic
+ / \
+ o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master
+------------
+
+This would leave only one merge commit when your topic branch is
+finally ready and merged into the master branch. This merge
+would require you to resolve the conflict, introduced by the
+commits marked with `*`. However, often this conflict is the
+same conflict you resolved when you created the test merge you
+blew away. `git-rerere` command helps you to resolve this final
+conflicted merge using the information from your earlier hand
+resolve.
+
+Running `git-rerere` command immediately after a conflicted
+automerge records the conflicted working tree files, with the
+usual conflict markers `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` in
+them. Later, after you are done resolving the conflicts,
+running `git-rerere` again records the resolved state of these
+files. Suppose you did this when you created the test merge of
+master into the topic branch.
+
+Next time, running `git-rerere` after seeing a conflicted
+automerge, if the conflict is the same as the earlier one
+recorded, it is noticed and a three-way merge between the
+earlier conflicted automerge, the earlier manual resolution, and
+the current conflicted automerge is performed by the command.
+If this three-way merge resolves cleanly, the result is written
+out to your working tree file, so you would not have to manually
+resolve it. Note that `git-rerere` leaves the index file alone,
+so you still need to do the final sanity checks with `git diff`
+(or `git diff -c`) and `git update-index` when you are
+satisfied.
+
+As a convenience measure, `git-merge` automatically invokes
+`git-rerere` when it exits with a failed automerge, which
+records it if it is a new conflict, or reuses the earlier hand
+resolve when it is not. `git-commit` also invokes `git-rerere`
+when recording a merge result. What this means is that you do
+not have to do anything special yourself (Note: you still have
+to create `$GIT_DIR/rr-cache` directory to enable this command).
+
+In our example, when you did the test merge, the manual
+resolution is recorded, and it will be reused when you do the
+actual merge later with updated master and topic branch, as long
+as the earlier resolution is still applicable.
+
+The information `git-rerere` records is also used when running
+`git-rebase`. After blowing away the test merge and continuing
+development on the topic branch:
+
+------------
+ o---*---o-------o---o topic
+ /
+ o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master
+
+ $ git rebase master topic
+
+ o---*---o-------o---o topic
+ /
+ o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master
+------------
+
+you could run `git rebase master topic`, to keep yourself
+up-to-date even before your topic is ready to be sent upstream.
+This would result in falling back to three-way merge, and it
+would conflict the same way the test merge you resolved earlier.
+`git-rerere` is run by `git rebase` to help you resolve this
+conflict.
+
+
+Author
+------
+Written by Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
+
+GIT
+---
+Part of the gitlink:git[7] suite
--- /dev/null
+#!/usr/bin/perl
+#
+# REuse REcorded REsolve. This tool records a conflicted automerge
+# result and its hand resolution, and helps to resolve future
+# automerge that results in the same conflict.
+#
+# To enable this feature, create a directory 'rr-cache' under your
+# .git/ directory.
+
+use Digest;
+use File::Path;
+use File::Copy;
+
+my $git_dir = $::ENV{GIT_DIR} || ".git";
+my $rr_dir = "$git_dir/rr-cache";
+my $merge_rr = "$git_dir/rr-cache/MERGE_RR";
+
+my %merge_rr = ();
+
+sub read_rr {
+ if (!-f $merge_rr) {
+ %merge_rr = ();
+ return;
+ }
+ my $in;
+ local $/ = "\0";
+ open $in, "<$merge_rr" or die "$!: $merge_rr";
+ while (<$in>) {
+ chomp;
+ my ($name, $path) = /^([0-9a-f]{40})\t(.*)$/s;
+ $merge_rr{$path} = $name;
+ }
+ close $in;
+}
+
+sub write_rr {
+ my $out;
+ open $out, ">$merge_rr" or die "$!: $merge_rr";
+ for my $path (sort keys %merge_rr) {
+ my $name = $merge_rr{$path};
+ print $out "$name\t$path\0";
+ }
+ close $out;
+}
+
+sub compute_conflict_name {
+ my ($path) = @_;
+ my @side = ();
+ my $in;
+ open $in, "<$path" or die "$!: $path";
+
+ my $sha1 = Digest->new("SHA-1");
+ my $hunk = 0;
+ while (<$in>) {
+ if (/^<<<<<<< .*/) {
+ $hunk++;
+ @side = ([], undef);
+ }
+ elsif (/^=======$/) {
+ $side[1] = [];
+ }
+ elsif (/^>>>>>>> .*/) {
+ my ($one, $two);
+ $one = join('', @{$side[0]});
+ $two = join('', @{$side[1]});
+ if ($two le $one) {
+ ($one, $two) = ($two, $one);
+ }
+ $sha1->add($one);
+ $sha1->add("\0");
+ $sha1->add($two);
+ $sha1->add("\0");
+ @side = ();
+ }
+ elsif (@side == 0) {
+ next;
+ }
+ elsif (defined $side[1]) {
+ push @{$side[1]}, $_;
+ }
+ else {
+ push @{$side[0]}, $_;
+ }
+ }
+ close $in;
+ return ($sha1->hexdigest, $hunk);
+}
+
+sub record_preimage {
+ my ($path, $name) = @_;
+ my @side = ();
+ my ($in, $out);
+ open $in, "<$path" or die "$!: $path";
+ open $out, ">$name" or die "$!: $name";
+
+ while (<$in>) {
+ if (/^<<<<<<< .*/) {
+ @side = ([], undef);
+ }
+ elsif (/^=======$/) {
+ $side[1] = [];
+ }
+ elsif (/^>>>>>>> .*/) {
+ my ($one, $two);
+ $one = join('', @{$side[0]});
+ $two = join('', @{$side[1]});
+ if ($two le $one) {
+ ($one, $two) = ($two, $one);
+ }
+ print $out "<<<<<<<\n";
+ print $out $one;
+ print $out "=======\n";
+ print $out $two;
+ print $out ">>>>>>>\n";
+ @side = ();
+ }
+ elsif (@side == 0) {
+ print $out $_;
+ }
+ elsif (defined $side[1]) {
+ push @{$side[1]}, $_;
+ }
+ else {
+ push @{$side[0]}, $_;
+ }
+ }
+ close $out;
+ close $in;
+}
+
+sub find_conflict {
+ my $in;
+ local $/ = "\0";
+ open $in, '-|', qw(git ls-files -z -u) or die "$!: ls-files";
+ my %path = ();
+ my @path = ();
+ while (<$in>) {
+ chomp;
+ my ($mode, $sha1, $stage, $path) =
+ /^([0-7]+) ([0-9a-f]{40}) ([123])\t(.*)$/s;
+ $path{$path} |= (1 << $stage);
+ }
+ close $in;
+ while (my ($path, $status) = each %path) {
+ if ($status == 14) { push @path, $path; }
+ }
+ return @path;
+}
+
+sub merge {
+ my ($name, $path) = @_;
+ record_preimage($path, "$rr_dir/$name/thisimage");
+ unless (system('merge', map { "$rr_dir/$name/${_}image" }
+ qw(this pre post))) {
+ my $in;
+ open $in, "<$rr_dir/$name/thisimage" or
+ die "$!: $name/thisimage";
+ my $out;
+ open $out, ">$path" or die "$!: $path";
+ while (<$in>) { print $out $_; }
+ close $in;
+ close $out;
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+-d "$rr_dir" || exit(0);
+
+read_rr();
+my %conflict = map { $_ => 1 } find_conflict();
+
+# MERGE_RR records paths with conflicts immediately after merge
+# failed. Some of the conflicted paths might have been hand resolved
+# in the working tree since then, but the initial run would catch all
+# and register their preimages.
+
+for my $path (keys %conflict) {
+ # This path has conflict. If it is not recorded yet,
+ # record the pre-image.
+ if (!exists $merge_rr{$path}) {
+ my ($name, $hunk) = compute_conflict_name($path);
+ next unless ($hunk);
+ $merge_rr{$path} = $name;
+ if (! -d "$rr_dir/$name") {
+ mkpath("$rr_dir/$name", 0, 0777);
+ print STDERR "Recorded preimage for '$path'\n";
+ record_preimage($path, "$rr_dir/$name/preimage");
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+# Now some of the paths that had conflicts earlier might have been
+# hand resolved. Others may be similar to a conflict already that
+# was resolved before.
+
+for my $path (keys %merge_rr) {
+ my $name = $merge_rr{$path};
+
+ # We could resolve this automatically if we have images.
+ if (-f "$rr_dir/$name/preimage" &&
+ -f "$rr_dir/$name/postimage") {
+ if (merge($name, $path)) {
+ print STDERR "Resolved '$path' using previous resolution.\n";
+ # Then we do not have to worry about this path
+ # anymore.
+ delete $merge_rr{$path};
+ next;
+ }
+ }
+
+ # Let's see if we have resolved it.
+ (undef, my $hunk) = compute_conflict_name($path);
+ next if ($hunk);
+
+ print STDERR "Recorded resolution for '$path'.\n";
+ copy($path, "$rr_dir/$name/postimage");
+ # And we do not have to worry about this path anymore.
+ delete $merge_rr{$path};
+}
+
+# Write out the rest.
+write_rr();