static const char upload_pack_usage[] = "git-upload-pack [--strict] [--timeout=nn] <dir>";
+#define OUR_REF (1U << 1)
+#define WANTED (1U << 2)
#define MAX_HAS 256
#define MAX_NEEDS 256
-static int nr_has = 0, nr_needs = 0;
+static int nr_has = 0, nr_needs = 0, nr_our_refs = 0;
static unsigned char has_sha1[MAX_HAS][20];
static unsigned char needs_sha1[MAX_NEEDS][20];
static unsigned int timeout = 0;
{
int fd[2];
pid_t pid;
+ int create_full_pack = (nr_our_refs == nr_needs && !nr_has);
if (pipe(fd) < 0)
die("git-upload-pack: unable to create pipe");
char *buf;
char **p;
- if (MAX_NEEDS <= nr_needs)
- args = nr_has + 10;
+ if (create_full_pack)
+ args = 10;
else
args = nr_has + nr_needs + 5;
argv = xmalloc(args * sizeof(char *));
needs = 0;
for (;;) {
+ struct object *o;
unsigned char dummy[20], *sha1_buf;
len = packet_read_line(0, line, sizeof(line));
reset_timeout();
if (strncmp("want ", line, 5) || get_sha1_hex(line+5, sha1_buf))
die("git-upload-pack: protocol error, "
"expected to get sha, not '%s'", line);
- needs++;
+
+ /* We have sent all our refs already, and the other end
+ * should have chosen out of them; otherwise they are
+ * asking for nonsense.
+ *
+ * Hmph. We may later want to allow "want" line that
+ * asks for something like "master~10" (symbolic)...
+ * would it make sense? I don't know.
+ */
+ o = lookup_object(sha1_buf);
+ if (!o || !(o->flags & OUR_REF))
+ die("git-upload-pack: not our ref %s", line+5);
+ if (!(o->flags & WANTED)) {
+ o->flags |= WANTED;
+ needs++;
+ }
}
}
struct object *o = parse_object(sha1);
packet_write(1, "%s %s\n", sha1_to_hex(sha1), refname);
+ if (!(o->flags & OUR_REF)) {
+ o->flags |= OUR_REF;
+ nr_our_refs++;
+ }
if (o->type == tag_type) {
o = deref_tag(o);
packet_write(1, "%s %s^{}\n", sha1_to_hex(o->sha1), refname);